Différence entre les versions 11 et version actuelle
Résumé : Rollback to 2008-09-05 00:16 UTCPas de diff disponible.
There are several packages that tries to help you move across visible instead of logical lines. The two differ when Emacs display wraps lines (they never differ if Emacs display “truncates” lines).
…but physical-line is the only way I have found out, which works correctly with shift-up/down/end/home selections in cua mode (I tried also and visible-lines and screen-lines)
… and I am unable to find any bugs in the buffer’s last line with PhysicalLineMove …
I guess I should have documented the errors. I just tested it again, and what I noticed is that it breaks move-end-of-line (stupid advices!). And when you do:
<return> <return> x C-p C-n
at the end of the buffer, it rings the bell. There might be more, but the last time I used it for a couple of hours before I started noticing. – nschum
Thanks, I remember now I saw the the problems with move-end-of-line etc. I use this where I actually switched from move-beginning-of-line to beginning-of-line because of this:
;; Changed from move-beginning-of-line to beginning-of-line to support ;; physical-line-mode. (defun ourcomments-move-beginning-of-line(arg) "Move point to beginning of line or indentation. See `beginning-of-line' for ARG.
If `physical-line-mode' is on then the visual line beginning is first tried." (interactive "p") (let ((pos (point))) (call-interactively 'beginning-of-line arg) (when (= pos (point)) (skip-chars-forward " \t")))) (put 'ourcomments-move-beginning-of-line 'CUA 'move)
I do not know how to fix this problem. Do you have any idea? (Or are any of the other modes perhaps better?)
However the key sequence you entered above works without problem for me. Did you miss something?
There might be some problems with longlines-mode. I have not tried to find out since that mode has been a little bit problematic yet. Are there any other corner cases?
Are there any known problem with screen-lines.el?
See also LineCommands