網站地圖 最近更新 News ElispArea 教导

SuperDuperRedundantPlus

This is SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® the package so great you don’t even really need it!

Don’t get it here Lisp:SuperDuperRedundantPlus+.el

Things SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Can Not Do

Following subsections outline the benefits of not using SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® and enumerate the things it could do if standard Emacs didn’t provide tools for doing same already.

SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Does Not query-replace Multiple Files

Don’t use SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® to search files in a dired buffer containing regexp in order to query-replace over them.

Instead, just do:

‘dired-mark-files-containing-regexp’ followed by ‘dired-do-query-replace-regexp’.

See, you don’t need SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®.

SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® FAQ

SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Authors

SuperDuperRedundantPlus+ ® is authored those taking the time to learn Emacs and no longer need SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® (Hint, this is probably you!)

Does SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Have a Catchy Motto?

Yes. We say:

“Why use SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® when you already have Emacs?”

Can I Contribute to SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®?

SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® encourages input from the the EmacsWiki users.

If you are aware of a feature that ought to be provided by SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® but isn’t because Emacs already does it better we encourage you to submit your code snippets here under a dedicated section.

How Do I Contribute to the SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Project?

You can do this by following these steps:

Idiomatic SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Section Format:

Here is the standard template for adding your own SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®:

  === The SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Does Not Do XXXX ===

  SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® does not do {Description here}

  Don't use SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® to do `XXXX'

  Instead, just do:

  `code-snippet-here'

  See, you don't need SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®.

Are EmaksWiki Xrefs to SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Spam?

Absolutely Not.

Don’t worry if your EmacsWiki SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® xrefs are mostly irrelevant, confuse other users of the EmacsWiki or otherwise muddles an existing page.

As a SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® developer this should not concern you.

Is SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Borgish?

Yep.

Remember, other users must be made constantly aware of the myriad applications of SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®.

Also, remember this, once users learn of SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® they will be assimilated.

Why Is SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® Borgish?

Assimilation by SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® is important because without it SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® will never become a part of the standard Emacs distribution. Don’t blame the authors of SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® we believe it should be but Stefan Monnier and Chong Yidong don’t like SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®. Comrades we must force their hands.

Can I refer to SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® as SDRP+®

Does a bear wear the pope’s hat?

What license is SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® released under

Gnu vacuous v4.3 or any thing prior.

If I fork SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® can I use its source in my new package UBERSuperDuperRedundantPlus+®

Are you crazy man.. you’re joking right??? We will sue you for everything SuperDuperRedundantPlus+® is worth.

Are there other packages like SuperDuperRedundantPlus+®?

See TheIciclesWampeter


CategoryAccessibility CategoryBufferSwitching CategoryEmacsWikiSite CategoryHelp CategoryHistory CategoryHumor CategoryGlossary