Difference between revision 3 and current revision
Summary: Rollback to 2008-09-05 00:16 UTCNo diff available.
Some news servers insist on rewriting the message id in your upstream articles. This means that scoring follow-ups by scoring on the message id in your outgoing article (gnus-score-followup-article, gnus-score-followup-thread) won’t work. You still can score on subject, but this is not always what you want.
The following has nearly the same effect as scoring on your message id directly:
;; Increase Score for all follow-ups to my own articles (can't ;; use message-id for scoring since it is changed later by ;; my news feed) (defun hcz-gnus-score-followup (&optional score) "Add SCORE to all later articles in the thread the current buffer is part of. This version is for cases where the own message-id will later be rewritten upstream. It scores on the message-id of the parent article (which has nearly the same eff ect but also scores parallel replies). If there is no parent article (we are opening a thread), score on subject is done instead." (interactive "P") (setq score (gnus-score-delta-default score)) (when (gnus-buffer-live-p gnus-summary-buffer) (save-excursion (save-restriction (goto-char (point-min)) (let ((refs (mail-fetch-field "references"))) (if (and refs (string-match "\\(<[^<]+>\\)\\'" refs)) (progn (set-buffer gnus-summary-buffer) (gnus-summary-score-entry "references" (format "%s" (match-string 1 refs)) 's score (current-time-string))) ;; if we didn't find a reference (probably due to no ;; parent article), we increase the score on subject: (let ((subj (mail-fetch-field "subject"))) (when subj (set-buffer gnus-summary-buffer) (gnus-summary-score-entry "subject" subj 's score (current-time-string))))))))))
(add-hook 'message-sent-hook 'hcz-gnus-score-followup)